I am quite confident I could do it myself and there is even a guide and good documentation how everything works: You would be amazed what a single person can implement in matter of weeks or months when being properly paid. Now about the porting itself - I know what I am talking about. This is if the foundation cares about Blender.but lately it looks like it cares more about movies. So the foundation should listen for negative feedback and do what the community wants - not bash negative feedback with "do it yourself" - that's just douchbaggy. Also features can be funded beforehand from community and devs hired to do it - happened before nothing new. On the other hand if good actually useful features are being implemented and we see capable people rather doing things instead of postponing forever more funds will come. The foundation gets money from community, if the software stinks, community will give less money. It's totally out of line even if the software comes for free and without any warranty: I encounter this "if you don't like it do it yourself" arrogant argument with open-source quite often.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |